Astronomers believe they've found the  oldest thing they've ever seen  in the universe: It's a galaxy far, far  away from a time long, long  ago.                 
Hidden in a Hubble Space Telescope photo released   earlier this year is a small smudge of light that European astronomers   now calculate is a galaxy from 13.1 billion years ago. That's a time   when the universe was very young, just shy of 600 million years old.   That would make it the earliest and most distant galaxy seen so far.
By  now the galaxy is so ancient it probably doesn't  exist in its earlier  form and has already merged into bigger neighbors,  said Matthew Lehnert  of the Paris Observatory, lead author of the study  published online  Wednesday in the journal Nature.
 "We're  looking at the universe when it was a 20th of  its current age," said  California Institute of Technology astronomy  professor Richard Ellis,  who wasn't part of the discovery team. "In  human terms, we're looking  at a 4-year-old boy in the life span of an  adult."
"We're  looking at the universe when it was a 20th of  its current age," said  California Institute of Technology astronomy  professor Richard Ellis,  who wasn't part of the discovery team. "In  human terms, we're looking  at a 4-year-old boy in the life span of an  adult."
While Ellis finds the basis for the study "pretty  good," there have been other claims about the age  of distant space  objects that have not held up to scrutiny. And some  experts have  questions about this one. But even the skeptics praised  the study as  important and interesting.
The  European astronomers calculated the age after 16  hours of observations  from a telescope in Chile that looked at light  signatures of cooling  hydrogen gas.
Earlier  this year, astronomers had made a general  estimate of 600 to 800  million years after the Big Bang for the most  distant fuzzy points of  light in the Hubble photograph, which was  presented at an astronomy  meeting back in January.
In  the new study, researchers focused on a single  galaxy in their  analysis of hydrogen's light signature, further  pinpointing the age.  Garth Illingworth of the University of California,  Santa Cruz,  who was the scientist behind the Hubble image, said it  provides  confirmation for the age using a different method, something he  called  amazing "for such faint objects."
The new galaxy doesn't have a name — just a series of  letters  and numbers. So Lehnert said he and colleagues have called it  "the  high red-shift blob. "Because it takes so long for the light to  travel  such a vast time and distance, astronomers are seeing what the  galaxy  looked like 13.1 billion years ago at a time when it was quite  young —  maybe even as young as 100 million years old — Lehnert said. It  has  very little of the carbon or metal that we see in more mature stars  and is full of young, blue massive stars, he said.
What's  most interesting to astronomers is that this  finding fits with  theories about when the first stars and galaxies were  born. This galaxy  would have formed not too soon after them.
"We're  looking almost to the edge, almost within 100  million years of seeing  the very first objects," Ellis said. "One  hundred million years to a  human seems an awful long time, but in  astronomical time periods,  that's nothing compared to the life of the  stars."

 
No comments:
Post a Comment